Don’t call him “Princess” yet.


Cole's 2010 season: It's not as bad as you think. Photo by Steven M. Falk/Philadelphia Inquirer

I was going to write a limerick about Cole Hamels’s performance in the home opener, but decided to write a post instead.

Yes, Cole gave up a cheapie home run to Nationals left fielder and Sexy Opponent of the Series Josh Willingham in the second inning yesterday. Yes, he had a horrible fourth inning by allowing three runs, and he left two men on base when Chad Durbin came on in relief in the sixth. And yes, the offense bailed his puppy-in-a-backpack ass out once again.

But it wasn’t all bad, and it certainly could have been worse.

After serving up the dinger to Willingham, Hamels would retire his next six batters, including strike outs to Adam Kennedy and Willy Taveras.  In the fourth, after allowing a single to Cristian Guzman and then grazing the perky man-tits of Adam Dunn, he managed to strike out Willingham and Ian Desmond. The pitch he struck Desmond out with was clocked at 93 MPH by the radar, so it appears that his velocity is back. In the fifth, he would finally have a 1-2-3 inning, and he would have finished the sixth if not for a Juan Castro error.

Part of our problem as fans is that we’re still comparing the Cole of 2010 to the WFC MVP King Cole of 2008, but I don’t know if that’s a fair comparison.  So I went to my favorite baseball-statitics site, Baseball Reference.com, to see how Cole did in his first two starts of last season.

So far in 2010, Cole’s record is 2-0, and he has a mediocre ERA of 5.06. He’s pitched 10.2 innings, allowed seven runs (six earned) on 11 hits, walked five, and struck out eleven. He’s given up two homers.

But at this point in 2009, Cole’s record was 0-2, and his ERA was 11.17. That’s right, Phillies phans. His ERA back then was more than double of what it is now. He allowed 12 runs (all earned) on 19 hits in 9.2 innings of work. He had given up four homers, and only struck out five.

So if we compare Hamels’s first two starts of this season with his first two starts of last season, I’d say that he’s markedly improved. No, he’s not the Cole of 2007 or 2008 yet, but we should keep the pitchforks left over from the Donovan McNabb-era in the shed for the time being, and continue to give Cole his chance for redemption. At least until he really fucks up, anyway.

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. Hey Doll:

    I know you are right. Its hard to bring out the pitchforks when the man is 2-0! And he has gotten me two fantasy wins to boot! I think part of the problem, and I hate to say it because it has been beat to death, but I still am holding him to Cliffleean standards, and yes I know that is wrong! I think his location is still off, but I guess you can’t expect him to pitch no hitters everytime out. So yea he gets a pass, how can we not give him a pass, he hasnt lost?!?!

  2. He hasn’t lost but be on the lookout for a post sometime this week on why W-L records are pure crap. And another on why we need to get over Cliff Lee =)

    I agree that he is MUCH improved from whatever BS he came up with last year in te begining of the season but he can’t keep pitching great games with an epic meltdown halfway thru it and rely on the offense to bail him out. It seems silly to talk about the necessity of consistency in a streaky sport like baseball but he won’t keep picking up those W’s if he keeps up this pattern. I don’t expect perfection every time but gosh darn it..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: